Calgary 9/11 Truth

The We Are Change Phenomenon

For more information about We Are Change, go to their homepage: wearechange.org For more news and information free of corporate control, visit: http://www.corbettreport.com

New World Order On Trial

A magnificent video showing the criminals of the World talking about the New World Order. Everyone should watch this to see who the real criminals and terrorists are.

Phil Hayton former BBC Anchor Questioned About Famous WTC 7 Reporting

Phil Hayton the former BBC anchorman who was the anchor during the famous premature BBC Building 7 collapse footage, is questioned by WeAreChange UK. During the footage the reporter Jane Standley is filmed talking of the collapse of Building 7 while the building stands behind her. The BBC could not explain this anomaly. Phil Hayton reported the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building (Building 7) approximately 26 minutes before it actually did. Where did he get this information?

March On Ottawa 9-11-2008

Canada’s 9/11 Truth Movement is peaceful, united, and committed to getting a Canadian independent investigation into 9/11. From coast to coast, 9/11 Truth Groups from St. John’s, Newfoundland to Victoria, British Columbia have realized that their strengths lie in their numbers of a united front, and united they will be on September 11th, 2008.

Over the last couple months, the Canadians have been busy. First, the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Society took the initiative to mail a copy of Yukihisa Fujita’s Parliamentary Presentation to all 308 Members of the Canadian Parliament. Since then, 9/11 Truth activists across the country have been pressing their MP’s by asking if they have received the video, taken the time to watch it, and ask them their stance on 9/11. Shortly after, East Vancouver MP Libby Davies has since agreed to take a petition to the Canadian Parliament requesting a Canadian Investigation into 9/11 – and this is just the beginning. Currently, 10 cities in Canada have joined forces and are creating their first ever (and if successful, the last) national campaign for 9/11 Truth...

As signatures are being collected from Canadians across the country, the authors of the petition are working with MP Davies in getting the timing right for introducing it into Parliament. The plan is to introduce the petition around August 1st, 2008, as Canada officially allows up to 45 days for answering any petition. An August 1st submission will allow an answer forthcoming by September 11th, 2008.

www.marchonottawa2008.org

Alex Jones & Jason Bermas - New 9/11 Films

WeAreChangeLA 4-11-08 freeway blogging

Dr.Steven Jones Analyzes WTC Dust Samples

Dr.Steven Jones analyzes dust samples from the World Trade Center. The samples conclusively show evidence of controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.

Ridiculous Police State Tactics Used By BC Transit Police

B.C. transit police stun fare cheaters with Taser: documents

Last Updated: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 |  1:57 PM ET

CBC News

Transit police on SkyTrain stations in Metro Vancouver have used Taser stun guns on passengers who didn't pay the fare and tried to run away, CBC News has learned.

Transit police in Metro Vancouver are allowed to deploy a Taser when the situation demands control over a 'non-compliant, suicidal, potentially violent or violent individual.'
(CBC)

Transit police have fired Tasers 10 times since January last year, and three cases involved non-violent suspects, according to internal police reports obtained by CBC News using access to information laws.

In one case, a person ran from transit cops during a check for free-riders and "the Taser was deployed as the subject fled," the documents say. Another person who didn't pay the fare was arrested but "grabbed onto the platform railing and refused to let go … the Taser was deployed."

A Taser may be used when "the situation demands control over a non-compliant, suicidal, potentially violent, or violent individual and lower force options were ineffective," according to the transit police policy.

Stunning someone without a transit ticket doesn't qualify as an appropriate use of a Taser, said Murray Mollard, executive director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association.

B.C. Solicitor General John van Dongen says transit police must adhere to the same standards as other police officers when using Tasers.
(CBC)

"I would call it a shocking abuse and misuse of a very significant weapon," Mollard told CBC News Tuesday.

Liberal MP Ujjal Dosanjh, who's on a federal committee reviewing the use of Tasers, said transit police have gone too far.

"That's the example where Taser use has just gotten out of hand and I believe the government needs to actually bring them under some kind of control," he said.

Federal New Democrat MP Penny Priddy also called such a use of Taser "absolutely intolerable."

B.C.'s solicitor general didn't comment on whether transit police use of Tasers was justified, saying the officers must adhere to the same standards as other police when it comes to proper use of the Taser.

"They are expected to conduct themselves in the same manner using the same tools as other police, and they are subject to the same review process [and] the same accountability through the office of the police commissioner," John van Dongen said.

Dosanjh said British Columbia should be proactive in ensuring SkyTrain police are using Tasers properly.

Van Dongen said he will wait for Ottawa's report on Tasers before taking any action.

Comment: Tasers are a form of torture and should be banned.

Rob Breakenridge interviews The Liar Pat Curley

  Part 1                                                   Part 2

   Part 3                                                   Part 4

       Part 5

(sarcasm on) Our good buddy, Rob Breakenridge (sarcasm off) interviewed a total slanderous liar named Pat Curley of the blog called Screw Loose Change last night on his very low rated evening radio show.  At the beginning of the show Pat Curley spews outright slanderous lies against talk show host Alex Jones.  Then he gets into his lies about 9/11.  Then Rob Breakenridge took calls.  I had a heated exchange and did the best I could to battle their lies.  It was hard while I was being talked over the whole time.  Then Nathan Moulton called in and he in turn was walked all over as well and could barely get a word in.  Then of all people, Troy from West Virginia calls in to slander 9/11 Truth as he always does.  A couple more sheep called in but of course they couldn't debate the facts of 9/11, they just attacked 9/11 Truth which is always the case.  I've uploaded the interview in 5 parts to YouTube.   

Ludicrous Breakenridge Hit Piece Attacks Ventura On WTC Collapse Comments

Radio host spews outright falsehoods, cites discredited reports to smear former Governor

Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Thursday, April 10, 2008 An almost unbelievably absurd and weak hit piece against Jesse Ventura’s contention that WTC 7 was deliberately imploded on 9/11 compares a 4-story church that was a stone’s throw away from the twin towers with a 47-story skyscraper that was nearly 400 feet away. Responding to the former Minnesota Governor’s recent appearance on Fox News, CHQR radio host Rob Breakenridge writes, "Ventura obviously thinks this sounds very clever, but there’s one point on which he’s factually incorrect: it was more than three buildings. The twin towers (1WTC & 2WTC) obviously collapsed, as did 7WTC - the three buildings Ventura cites. What he neglects to mention is that 3WTC (Marriott Hotel) and St. Nick’s Cathedral also collapsed that day." Let’s start with Breakenridge’s absurd example of St. Nicholas Church as a building that was destroyed by the twin towers’ collapse on 9/11. This is a picture of the 4-story Church building. It stands in the shadow of the 1362-foot tall south tower. To compare this with a gigantic 576-foot tall skyscraper that would be the tallest building in most major cities and stands a full 355 feet away from the north tower is patently ludicrous. The humble church building is like an ant compared to the colossal south tower, of course it would have been crushed when the south tower collapsed. How on earth can Breakenridge draw a parallel between this tiny building and a gigantic skyscraper that was nearly half as tall as the twin towers? The 47-story WTC 7 following the collapse of the twin towers. Somewhat different to the 4-story St. Nicholas Church. Breakenridge then cites WTC 4, 5 and 6 as buildings that were destroyed and "had to be brought down manually or otherwise they, too, would have collapsed." The difference between all these buildings and WTC 7 was that they were all closer to the twin towers than Building 7 and none of them collapsed in a 7-second implosion style demolition. All were pelted by debris and essentially hollowed out, but their basic foundation remained in place and they did not fall to the ground at the speed of gravity within 7 seconds. All the buildings remained standing until they were demolished weeks later. In comparison, WTC had suffered little debris damage because it stood a full 355 feet away from the north tower and yet it imploded into its own footprint in an instant. Breakenridge cites World Trade Center Building 3 (pictured above), known publicly as the 22-story Marriott Hotel, which was positioned between the twin towers. The building was sliced in half during the collapse of WTC 2, yet it did not experience uniform collapse either vertically or horizontally. WTC 3 was in the middle of the WTC towers, whereas Building 7 was 355 feet away. WTC 3 was less than half the height of WTC 7 and yet WTC 7 experienced a full implosion-style collapse within 7 seconds, while the foundation of WTC 3 survived. In the map above you can see that WTC 3 is sandwiched in-between the twin towers, whereas WTC 7 is more than a block away from the north tower. A comparison between WTC 3 and WTC 7, even taking into account the fact that WTC 3 was not completely destroyed despite taking the brunt of both twin towers whereas WTC 7 was imploded, is clearly another ridiculous parallel to draw. Breakenridge then attempts to back up his preposterous argument by citing "peer-reviewed papers on the collapse" of the buildings, including the 10,000 page NIST report. This is probably news to Breakenridge, but NIST itself has completely failed to address the cause of WTC 7’s collapse and has not yet issued a final report on the reason for the 7-second implosion. In addition, NIST itself admits that the debris from the twin towers was not the cause of the collapse. Breakenridge also cites, "The study by a Cambridge University engineer (which) demonstrates that once the collapse of the twin towers began, it was destined to be rapid and total." First of all, Breakenridge starts out talking about Building 7 but then suddenly switches to citing reports about the collapse of the twin towers, which is bizarre but unsurprising considering the laughable amateurish nature of his article. Furthermore, the alleged Cambridge University report has been completely debunked because its conclusions violate fundamental laws of physics. The report, "essentially claims that a falling body can fall through the path of most resistance. Such a claim is ludicrous and defies all logic or honest scientific integrity," according to J A Blacker MSc IMI, who wrote to the university demanding the report be corrected. Mr Blacker’s request also challenges the claim that “All the floors offered the same flimsy resistance," when in fact, "each had different construction characteristics, the lower floor core columns were over double the thickness compared to the upper floors.” “The Seffen paper claims that burning jet fuel in air can weaken ALL the steel girders evenly (hence symmetrical collapse due to gravity of all columns perfectly), yet both ends of these outer and inner massive columns were outside the fire zone to differing degrees hence heat would have conducted up and down very efficiently at different rates, and many columns were not even subjected to any significant fire. Are we really expected to believe that fire can weaken steel evenly despite the core columns conducting heat efficiently at varying rates away from varied regions of temperature?” concludes Blacker. Breakenridge’s pathetic attempt to smear Jesse Ventura is atypical of the hit pieces against the 9/11 truth movement that we’ve become accustomed to - setting up straw man arguments, making comparisons between completely anathema scenarios, and using arguments that violate the very basic laws of physics.

Jesse Ventura OWNS Hannity & Colmes on 9/11

On the Hannity and Colmes Show of Faux News, Jesse Ventura basically schooled and owned the corporate shills when they brought up 9/11. They had nothing to say. Jesse Ventura is very well versed in the facts of 9/11 and is not afraid to speak about them. This is huge for the 9/11 Truth movement.

We Are Change Meets Rosie O'Donnell w/Daniel Sunjata

Luke Rudkowski with the support of Daniel Sunjata met with Rosie O'Donnell at a Barnes & Noble book signing and Rosie showed her support of the 9/11 First Responders. Great work again Luke. Support the First Responders if you can by bidding on the books at http://www.wearechange.org

Calgary 9/11 Truth meets Jack Layton

Canadian NDP Leader Jack Layton did a book signing in Calgary for his new book "Homelessness" Nathan Moulton from Calgary 9/11 Truth took this opportunity to ask Jack about the North American Union and 9/11 Truth.

9/11 Truth in Ottawa

Great video of spreading truth in Ottawa Canada and getting the Canadian perspective about 9/11.

Governor Jesse Ventura Now Believes 9/11 Was A Planned Controlled Demolition

On the April 2, 2008 edition of the Alex Jones Radio Show, former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura unleashed his beliefs on 9/11.  He stated that the World Trade Center and Building 7 were brought down with explosives in a controlled demolition, and also stated he recommends everyone watch the film Loose Change.  Astonishing revelations from Ventura.  He was last interviewed by Alex Jones about 1 and a half years ago, and at that time Ventura dismissed 9/11 theories but said he would look into it.  Looks like he has.   Great work Alex Jones!

Endgame Screening in Calgary Theater

Alex Jones' Endgame was shown at the Plaza Theater in Calgary Canada on March 30th, Nathan Moulton gave a brief overview of the film in front of the full house.

Call For New 9/11 Investigation Reaches Crescendo

Public figures increasingly speaking out while media ignores professionals and experts

Paul Joseph Watson PrisonPlanet.com Friday, March 28, 2008

Calls for a new 9/11 inquiry are reaching a crescendo, with well-respected authorities and celebrities alike adding their voices to the cause, as the official 9/11 story crumbles under the weight of revelations of White House ties to the 9/11 Commission, and other cover-ups on behalf of authorities staffed with investigating the attacks.

The corporate media's insistence on ignoring hundreds of professional experts who are calling for a new 9/11 investigation has spurred many celebrities to use their public platforms to speak out, knowing that the press will at least have to address the issue.

The latest to do so is top comedian Margaret Cho, who told the Alex Jones Show yesterday that the public were going to become very angry when it was fully disclosed that the attacks were a conspiracy, concurring with fellow comedian George Carlin who also questioned the official story last year.

The path was trailblazed by Charlie Sheen in March 2006 when he spoke of his doubts about the official story and questioned the collapse of WTC Building 7. Sheen was endlessly smeared for weeks after but he prompted a national debate about 9/11 and the 9/11 Truth Movement enjoyed what many consider to be its most productive year.

In September 2006, former Governor, actor and wrestling star Jesse Ventura questioned 9/11 during an on-camera interview with Alex Jones and also cited Operation Northwoods and the Gulf of Tonkin as examples of how the government has planned and carried out staged war provocations in the past.

In July 2007, popular film maker Michael Moore told WeAreChange.org reporters that he had many more questions about 9/11 than at the time of making Fahrenheit 9/11 and did not believe the public had been told "half the truth" about what really happened.

Martin Sheen echoed his son's comments in October 2007 along with rising actor Mark Ruffalo, following in the footsteps of Rosie O'Donnell, who caused shockwaves when she brought 9/11 truth to national prominence during her stint as The View host.

The View was also used as a platform for actor James Brolin to raise 9/11 truth, who questioned the official version of events in the same week that acclaimed director David Lynch spoke out.

Lynch told Dutch television he thought WTC Building 7 was brought down via controlled demolition and that the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crash sites were suspicious due to the absence of evidence that a plane crashed at either location.

Other notable public figures speaking out at the same time included Ed Asner, Matthew Bellemy of Muse and director Richard Linklater.

American icon Willie Nelson threw his hat in the ring last month, when he told The Alex Jones Show that he thought the twin towers were imploded like condemned Las Vegas casino buildings.

Nelson's comments were almost universally blackballed by the corporate media, who had patently learned from the Sheen controversy that smear campaigns were only leading to more people being exposed to the information and beginning the wake-up process.

Of course, the really important advocates of 9/11 truth are the hundreds of architects, scholars, engineers and other expert professionals who are demanding a fresh inquiry, but they are habitually ignored by the media as the 9/11 Truth Movement is smeared as a fringe interest fad populated by kooks and imbeciles.

In reality, doubts about the official 9/11 story are shared by a myriad of well-respected figures.

The Japanese Parliament were recently a captive audience to a 9/11 truth presentation by Fujita Yukihisa - a member of the House of Councillors in the Diet.

Andreas von Buelow, the former German Defense Secretary, was perhaps the first most prominent individual to go on the record back in 2004, when he blamed the CIA for orchestrating the attacks.

He was followed by former environment minister in Tony Blair's government Michael Meacher, who questioned the stand down of NORAD on 9/11 and dismissed the entire war on terror as a hoax.

Veteran CIA agent and respected geopolitical expert Robert Baer said that "all the evidence points to" 9/11 having had elements of an inside job during a radio apperance in June 2006.

Late last year, former Italian President Francesco Cossiga told Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.

Former Wall Street Journal editor, U.S. Treasury Secretary and founder of Reaganomics Paul Craig Roberts questioned the susupicious collapse of the twin towers and Building 7 in February 2006.

Headed up by Richard Gage, the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth organization lists hundreds of experts in their field who all concur that the implosion of the buildings is not consistent with the official story and needs to be investigated.

Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice, headed by Professor Steven Jones, counts amongst its ranks hundreds of physicists, scientists and academic professionals who all share doubts about 9/11.

Another website, Patriots For 9/11 Truth, lists hundreds more former government, military, air force, and navy officials who have all spoken out about 9/11.

With the impartiality of the 9/11 Commission having been blown wide open by revelations of White House ties with Philip Zelikow, allied to the fact that the Pentagon knowingly lied to the Commission during testimony, the call for a new independent inquiry, armed with subpoena powers, is amplifying to a crescendo.

Allegations of a cover-up in regard to the organization responsible for investigating the collapse of the twin towers on behalf of FEMA this week also increased the pressure.

The more prominent figures that add their voice to that call, be they captains of culture or respected authorties in their discipline, can only increase the eventual likelihood of a new investigation.

Ron Paul on Coast To Coast AM Wants New 9/11 Investigation

Ron Paul was a guest on Coast To Coast AM last night.  He stated that he supports a new 9/11 investigation.

Woman Waving From WTC 1 Impact Area (Edna Cintron)

Woman Waving From
WTC 1 Impact Area

Courtesy Michael Rivero of WhatReallyHappened.com

This photograph taken from the WTC report shows the aircraft impact area of WTC 1...

...it also shows a survivor looking out from the hole made by the aircraft impact:

Zoom of above image - click for full size	Enhanced image - click full size
A second photograph gives a better view of the woman and the lack of fire   click for full size
Video #1 of woman Video #2 of woman
The woman has been tentatively identified by her husband as Edna Cintron, an administrative assistant for Marsh & McLennan. Glass melts at 700°C, therefore an 800°C+ inferno burning at the core of WTC 1 would have shattered or melted all of the windows at the aircraft impact level. Video #2 proves the building did not contain a raging inferno as it shows many of the windows at the impact level are intact.
Another survivor was also caught on film in the aircraft impact area of WTC 1:

---

See also:

WTC 1: There Was No Inferno
The 9/11 WTC Collapses: An Audio-Video Analysis

---

We Are Change Confronts Bo Dietl on his "Potato Chip" Theory

March 11, 2008 WeAreChange had a great day for 9/11 Truth including confronting Bo Dietl on his bogus potato chip theory.  Warning Bo Dietl uses foul language.  In my opinion Dietl is a liar and a phony and he has mob connections but he actually seems genuine here.  Also him telling that his daughter questions the official story and that he first believed bombs were in the building are a positive thing.  I would like to see if he could come back on Bill O'Reilly's show and talk about it more.